Dear Mr. or Ms. UN Ambassador and Head of states and Countries
WE are writing an appeal to you. Please don’t judge our writing; we are only 15 and 12 years old. I also suffer from dyslexia, so please take time in reading our letter.
We are, Kevin Christian Baylis 15th Years old, DOB. 11th October 1996, South African citizen with dual nationality with America due to our father and Jenvey Trevor Baylis, 12th years old. We were abducted by fraud and trafficked to the United Kingdom by Dennis Gordon Nissen; he had the support of the United Kingdom embassy. We need to state this is not the first time he did it. We would you like you to reunite us with our loving parents Jeremy lynn Baylis and Maryna Baylis
We are not going to go over the full 14 years of abuse, attached you will find Jenvey’s view of his life so far and my view of my life so far.
A small break down of what happened:
This letter can be viewed in full on the family website.
ON BEHALF OF THE BAYLIS FAMILY
At 5.15am Monday 10th October 2011 in Mexico City 35 including Mr Nissen and a UK DR Jennifer Mary Gray Hogg people broke into the Family Home of the Baylis Family and Forcibly abducted two boys aged 11 and 15 who were then taken to the British Embassy and held until a court hearing and then they were taken out of Mexico to the UK against their will under the auspices of the British Embassy & Foreign and Common Wealth Office where they are now held incommunicado and missing. The 35 people included and were led by British Embassy Staff and agents and the snatch is being treated as an unlawful kidnap and abduction by Mexican Federal Authorities and as a serious diplomatic incident and assault on the Sovereignty of Mexico by Great Britain.
The two boys Kevin & Jenvey, who are the natural children of their parents Maryna & Jeremy Baylis as evidenced by DNA testing, have been subject to international custody proceedings where by a Dennis Gordon Nissen has claimed them as his children, after the mother fled the UK where she had been trafficked to by Dennis Gordon Nissen many years previous. Mr Nissen applied to UK court for the children to be made a ward of court and for them to be placed in his care. But the matter was decided by a Hague Convention International Court ruling in 2009 that the children were not the children of Mr Nissen and were the natural children of Maryna & Jeremy Baylis and that Mr Nissen had no rights to them.
The South African government step forward and provided proof that Nissen never had rights of custody to Kevin and Jenvey Baylis, he is not the Natural nor the legal father of the children, and has no legal claims to the children. The UK decided to ignore international law on international citizens.
They family’s supporters published a website before the kidnap with the background history which itself is quite shocking: www.baylis-family.info
(Reported Attack Page!
This web page at http://www.baylis-family.info has been reported as an attack page and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack pages try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.Some attack pages intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.)
The family who are USA and South African Nationals as follows:
Father-Jeremy Baylis USA National
Mother- Maryna Baylis South African National
Kevin – Son Dual South African & USA National
Jenvey – Son Dual South African & USA National
They mother and children have Since fleeing the UK, with the help of their father, have been living under the Humanitarian Protection of the Mexican Government against being taken by Mr Nissen and the UK including being under the guard of the Mexican Police Authorities, there have been several attempted snatches.
Whilst there was a court hearing at 9am+ that day in Mexico City by Mr Nissen it was not a Hague Convention Application but was one of the type made where children’s parents are not living and did not account for either the Hague ruling or the fact that the family were under state protection or the fact that the children’s parents were alive.
Britain declared foreign nationals dead without informing their embassies. Britain snatched children without informing the South African or American goverments.
The children have effectively been kidnapped by force and fraud by both Mr Nissen and the British Government along with the following breaches:
The Sovereignty of the Mexican Government
International Law and Treaty
The Lawful Protection of the Mexican Government
The Hague Convention and Ruling of The Hague Court.
The Safety and Welfare of the Children
The Criminal Law of Mexico
A report was made by the UK representative of both the Parents and the Children in the UK in the very early hours of Tuesday morning to the United Kingdom Human Trafficking Centre (UKHTC) part of SOCA (The Serious and organized Crime Agency) which runs 24/7 who said this it was hardly believable but would make enquiries and call back either that night or the next morning, no call back was received and so a report was made directly by 999 call to a Detective Inspector of the Serious Crime Unit of Hampshire Constabulary. The details of the matter kidnap and abduction, and the call to SOCA were given and a crime number was asked for but not given stating that enquiries would be made of SOCA first. The DI from Hampshire Police rang back very fast after enquires with UKHTC SOCA stating that the Police would not be dealing with Matters further.
The UK police decided straight away that they will not investigate the crime commited by Nissen. Just like they would not investigate the death threats he made against us.
We had our human rights violated, our children’s rights. Who does the damn UK think they are that they can tell us we will not see our mommy and daddy anymore, we will no longer be South African and American’s we are now British, who the hell do they think they are telling US WE ARE NO LONGER BAYLIS BUT HAVE TO USE THE SURNAME OF THE ABUSER NISSEN.
Who the hell do they, the United Kingdom think they are to do this to us, we are not the only children they do this to.
We are South Africans with dual nationality to America, we are proud of our roots, we aint British, and we are glad we are not British. WE don’t want to be British. We want our identities back.
We have been held against our will in the UK for the past nearly 9 months with no contact with our mother or father or our biological family. The following rights has been violated and ignored by the UK.
1. Our Human right to a family life
2. Our right to be living with our loving parents
3. Our right to medical care
4. Our right to freedom
5. Our right to an education
6. Our right to live a life without any abuse
7. Our right to be protected and to be kept safe
8. Our right to have contact with our family
9. Our right to privacy
10. Our rights to Free Speech
11. Our rights to Safety from violence
12. Fair trial
13. To be a citizen of a country We are South Africans with dual nationality to America, why did the UK take that away from us and made us British without our mothers permission
14. Our rights To think freely
15. The right to love, our parents.
16. Our rights to have our own identities
Starvation, lack of medical help, lack of food, torture, human trafficking under the hands of political lords, etc, all come under human rights violations. When the freedom to speak, express, write, move around one’s own country or city are curbed and put under restriction, it results in human rights violations. Laws that do not allow intra-racial marriages, inter caste marriages, same-sex marriages also form violation of human rights. One cannot take away the right to love whosoever the heart desires from an individual. There are still many human rights violations that involve racism and skin color. Individual’s are still singled out based on their skin color, ethnicity and nationality.
So the UK is allowed to do the above to two children while the UN look on and do nothing to safe them.
Our children’s rights that are violated:
1. The right to Education:
2. The right to Expression: Every child has a right to express himself freely in which ever way he likes
3. The right to Information: Every child has a right to know his basic rights and his position in the society.
4. The right to Nutrition:
5. The right to Health & Care
6. The right to protection from Abuse: There are approximately 2 million child commercial sex workers between the age of 5 and 15 years and about 3.3 million between 15 and 18 years. 500,000 children are forced into this trade every year.
7. The right to protection from Exploitation:
8. The right to protection from Neglect: Every child has a right to lead a well protected and secure life away from neglect.
9. The right to Development: Every child has the right to development that lets the child explore her/his full potential.
10. The right to Recreation: Every child has a right to spend some time on recreational pursuits like sports, entertainment and hobbies to explore and develop.
11. The right to Name & Nationality: Every child has a right to identify himself with a nation. THE UK IS BREAKING THIS RIGHT BY CHNAGING OUR NATIONALITY AND NAME
12. The right to Survival
The following is being violated as well under the UK owns children law
The UK ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) on 16 December 1991. That means the UK government now has to make sure that every child has all the rights outlined in the treaty except in those areas where the government has entered a specific reservation.
So why do they violate that of Jenvey and myself.
1. the right to life, survival and development
2. the right to have their views respected, and to have their best interests considered at all times
3. the right to a name and nationality, freedom of expression, and access to information concerning them
4. the right to live in a family environment or alternative care, and to have contact with both parents wherever possible
5. health and welfare rights, including rights for disabled children, the right to health and health care, and social security
6. the right to education, leisure, culture and the arts
7. special protection for refugee children, children in the juvenile justice system, children deprived of their liberty and children suffering economic, sexual or other forms of exploitation
The rights included in the convention apply to all children and young people, with no exceptions.
So lets see we go and abduct 2 children from Mexico, who is South African and American we bring them back to England, then change their names and their identies and we claim it is in the best interest of the child.
Lets declare them too stupid to know what they need and where they want to live. Lets cut their mom and dad out of their lives. We the United Kingdom know the UN wont do anything to protect these boys.
The above cover our rights that are being violated.
We were removed by force from a 3rd party country that was protecting us from Nissen and Britian. This is what the word FORCE mean in the area of law.
In the field of law, the word force has two main meanings: unlawful violence and lawful compulsion. “Force” is an expression that can be used as falling under the category of either unlawful violence or lawful compulsion.
“Forced Entry” is a special case that can be an example of unlawful violence or lawful entry dependent on who is exercising the violence (or threat thereof) and their legal right and/or responsibility to do so. The same would apply to someone being taken away by force if there was or was not lawful authority to do so.
Where there is forced entry and someone is taken away without lawful authority these are criminal acts in any national law and this is called kidnapping.
Where there is forced entry and someone is taken away by officials of one country in and from the territory of another without lawful authority this is an incursion into Sovereign Territory by one state into another with intent to commit criminal acts and is an assault on sovereignty on one nation by the other and a breach of the entire basis of lawful relations between countries.
In particular this is so where the person/child being taken by state officials of one country is being taken from the specific protection of another under sovereign state rights of protection not only in law but also under lawful decisions taken in court under international law but in this case from under the specific protective measures of that countries security services and where there is a specific court injunction not to. This is a gross and knowing and willful violation of both lawful authority and sovereignty by force and if this also involves not only force but fraud it shows contempt for not only for sovereignty but also all levels of law and international treaty.
It might be arguable that if the person under state protection is say an international criminal being protected by one country from the exercise of law in another, there could be some justification. But where the incursion and kidnap is of children that are not nationals of the country of those officials that take them, and the person (in this case children) have not committed a crime and are indeed under state protective measures to protect them then there can be no legal or moral justification. Especially where there is a Hague Convention Ruling that says the Children must remain with their parents and when the family are being protected there is no arguable case and the respect for law by the United Kingdom has broken down.
These are matters that should rightfully be taken to the UN Security Council and the Human Rights Commission by Mexico as they are that serious, no country should be involved in the kidnapping and abduction of minors and not only should any country that does be severely censured but universal outrage should be expressed.
The United Kingdom is increasingly being seen not only in the UK but internationally as a pariah and rogue state in regard to not only the treatment of its own citizen’s children but also those of non UK nationals.
Now the following is being violated as well.
The Vienna convention is violated under article 36 the following should happen:
Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to which 170 nations are party, requires a nation arresting or detaining a foreign national to afford the detainee access to his or her consulate and to notify the foreign national of the right of consular access.
The Hague convention is violated, The Hague ruled we should be living with our mother and father, the UK is ignoring it. They are violating our parents’ rights of custody to us and also our rights to a life free of abuse.
Article 13b Grave Risk of Harm
We can proof and we did in Mexico that Nissen sexual abuse us, he now has cut our parents out of our lives. He is still placing us currently at Grave risk and abuse. BUT THE UK ALLOWS THAT.
With all the above, given to you.
Please Mr UN ambasodor and head of states return us to our loving parents Jeremy and Maryna Baylis. We would like to go home to have a family life and a stable life. We would like to grow up knowing a real life not one of abuse.
Kevin Christain and Jenvey Trevor Baylis
Part V – Contemperaneous Notes and Accomplices
1.) contemporaneous notes: https://whatisthisukbollocks.wordpress.com/ copyright
2.) Maryanne Akacharitysweet shared Meet the trafficker of Kevin and Jenvey Baylis‘s album.